Even the expert committee was, after all, full of historians. Two ideas underprin the discontent — that the syllabus of Delhi University is hostage to a Leftist conspiracy and that the students who read this essay will be brainwashed into believing all the things the author says. It contains false stories quoted under one pretext or oral and other sic without any authenticity. Are the Jaina texts denouncing Rama, then? But this end brings home to Hanuman, the ever faithful bhakta of Rama, that there is no one Rama, there are many Ramas, and no single Ramayana but many Ramayanas. Rahul tells Sam Pitroda to apologise for ‘hua to hua’.

If you can edit out inconvenient truths or inconvenient ways of seeing India’s history from university syllabi, or ensure that there is silence around many subjects — a discussion of religion, a discussion of Shivaji’s life or the lives of key players in the National Movement — you come one step closer to ensuring that it is only your narrow view of history and India that will gain ground. Are the Jaina texts denouncing Rama, then? This page was last edited on 17 April , at Our culture is diverse and so are our legends. History Honours course, had attracted the ire of Hindutva activists because it talks about different versions of the Ramayana that abound in our country and beyond.

Sunday 27 November Sheo Dutt, an expert on Ancient History and Academic Council member, laments the way in which the Vice Chancellor has relinquished his authority. Obviously, those who speak in the name of upholding Indian read Hindu culture lack the legacy of that which they are claiming to uphold—respect for diversity, dialogue and interpretation.

Ramanujan’s Three Hundred Ramayanas: Transmission, Interpretation And Dialogue In Indian Traditions

I teach history at Jamia Millia Islamia. Jafri, to hide in his own office. It contains abusive and libelous language used for Divine Hindu deities.


300 ramayanas essay by ramanujan

However, Singh still has some defenders amongst his erstwhile colleagues. Text of statement by academics and concerned citizens against the assault on Prof Sanjay Kumar, in Motihari Champaran, Bihar. Crackdown on Activists – reports, commentary and public statements Paradise Papers: Also, though Valmiki’s telling focuses on Rama, other tellings focus on different characters.

Do you know of one where Sita doesn’t go with Rama to the forest? Critical analysis of texts is an integral part of humanities and social sciences education. Singh is a well-respected academic from the Maths Department, who took on the unenviable task of stepping in after his predecessor, Deepak Pental, had steamrolled in the semester system, ignoring widespread ramayanass across University.

Singh, was a pro-Vice Chancellor of Delhi University. Statement by Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd on the move to drop his books from the M. These are obvious counter narratives—the main essayy and characters remain the same. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The issue ended up in the Supreme Court which wanted the opinion of ramayabas academic expert committee.

Ramayana: An ‘epic’ controversy – BBC News

But the resolution of the AC is binding and we cannot really do anything further about this. It contains false stories quoted under one pretext or oral and other sic without any authenticity. Even Valmiki’s Ramayana has different readings in the country.

Growing propensity to equate safety with surveillance Education. At the centre of the controversy is the university’s Vice Chancellor, Prof. But it will not be easy to override the immense anger and opposition from the history department and other students. Esxay, if they so choose, they become teachers themselves and pass that knowledge on to others.


300 ramayanas essay by ramanujan

The Supreme Court ordered the appointment of a four-member Academic Committee to look into the sesay. Chahal argued that when it came to the Rama Setu controversy, the same historians said that Rama was not a historical subject, but now felt free to teach stories about Rama in a history course. I think raamnujan is being pressurised because this is very unlike him. In case anyone has missed the point, the essay in question is not a pamphlet written by a provocateur: However, Ramanujan considers only five tellings of Ramayana, namely, the tellings by ValmikiKambanthe Jain telling, the Thai Ramakien and the South Indian folk tellings.

300 ramayanas essay by ramanujan

And great poets like Bhasa took the liberty of resolving the entire problem of Rramanujan without a war. Ramanujan studies some of the myriad ‘tellings’ of the essay throughout South and South East Asia. He said they would make sure the essay that replaces Ramanujan’s does not contain ramayanaz offensive to Hindus, indication that this brand of academic vigilanteism will only intensify.

In Santhal oral tellings, Sita is even portrayed as an unfaithful wife and is seduced by both Ravana and Lakhshmana. Especially when doing so would suggest, whether the academic council intended this or not, that the university had caved in to violent intimidation.