Oppositors maintained that the death penalty is not a deterrent and that therehave been studies already debunking the deterrence theory. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Edgar Maligaya alleges that he was blindfolded, punched and pushed into a car where his head was held down between the front seats. Estrada administration Seven death convicts were executed during the Estrada administration before he announced amoratorium on executions. By , 98 countries and territories had abolished the death penalty in law or practice-including 57 countries which have abolished the death penalty for all crimes, 15 which have abolished capital punishment for all but exceptional crimes such as wartime crimes , and 26 which can be considered abolitionist de facto in that no executions have been carried out for ten years or more. Implementing the death penalty Is bad but If the lives of many persons In the state Is In danger to criminals, we must act and determine how to solve this problem.

In , when the death penalty was finally abolished, over prisoners, many of whom had been sentenced by military tribunals in the martial law period, were still under sentence of death. During martial law, Presidential Decree P. However, with the abolition ofthe death penalty law, the penalty imposed wasreclusion perpetua, without the possibility ofparole. Prisoners facing execution may also submit a petition for clemency to the President. Political offenses such as rebellion were dropped from thebill.

reimposition of death penalty in the philippines essay

Amnesty International acknowledges that the authorities are facing the challenge of serious, frequently violent crime. Under President Marcos the official justification for the death penalty increasingly became that of deterrence-and its application became deeply influenced by a context of worsening political tensions.

One of the grounds as to why human rights groups oppose the decease punishment is because of theweaknesses and imperfectnesss of the Philippine justness system. Unlike other judicial systems such as that of the United States, where there are a number of appeal avenues-including courts at the local, state and federal levels-in the Philippines all death penalty cases have only one level of judicial appeal and go directly to the Supreme Court.

Re-imposition of death penalty in the philippines Essay

This burning sensation-equivalent to the sensation of a hot poker being philippunes into the arm-will then travel with the chemical up the prisoner’s arm and spread across his chest until it reaches his heart, where it will cause the heart to stop’.


Despite the changing climate and high sentencing rates the number of executions actually carried out did not undergo a dramatic increase.

Under the Act the death penalty may be imposed for 13 “heinous crimes”: The sentence was besides reducedtoreclusion perpetua. Given the threat of irrevocable executions Amnesty International is also concerned that safeguards to ensure fair trials, including the right of the accused to competent legal counsel at all stages of proceedings, are not being consistently upheld.

A majority, rather than a unanimous decision, is required to confirm a death sentence. Any decease punishment already imposed shall be reduced to reclusionperpetua. Plastic bags are put over the head and held tightly at the back to suffocate the detainee.

By law the full Supreme Court of 15 justices en banc [26] must rule on death penalty cases. In a survey conducted among convicts inor The military pressure was acknowledged, with the bill’s preamble reading:. From February 6,a day after Leo Echegaray was executed, to May 31 two leadingnewspapers reported a total rssay crimes which could be punishable by death penalty.

Death Penalty in the Philippines Essay Paper

Eighty four 84 instances affecting 95 inmates were modified to reclusion perpetua. Suspects are often quickly handcuffed, punched and kicked and forced into waiting cars.

Neithershall decease punishment be imposed. Shoot to kill for every organised crime,” he said.

Essay About Death Penalty In The Philippines ‘Shoot-to-kill’

Your Answer is very helpful for Us Thank you a lot! There are also reports of court proceedings being conducted mostly in English, as is normal, with inadequate phliippines for translation into the various regional languages or dialects used as the first or only means of spoken communication by the overwhelming majority of death penalty defendants.

reimposition of death penalty in the philippines essay

General Ramos told Congress that a key reason behind low morale affecting the armed forces-which he believed was helping fuel repeated coup attempts by right-wing military rebels-was philippihes lack of legislative support for the AFP’s anti-insurgency campaign. Within this context Amnesty International and other Philippine human rights groups were dismayed that President Ramos, as he announced in late the creation of a special penaly task force-comprising elements from the PNP, AFP and National Bureau of Investigation NBI -to weed out police or military officers found to be corrupt or to have violated human rights, at the same time called for the Supreme Court to speed up the confirmation of death sentences.


President Aquinocertified as pressing one of these measures on the suggestion of Ramos. Though the flaws in the criminal justice system are clearly visible the death penalty is presented by the authorities, and accepted by much of the public, as an answer to the rising crime rate.

Death Penalty in the Philippines Essay Research Paper Example :

Individuals from all sections of Philippine society have sought to uphold and strengthen respect for the individual human dignity of all Filipinos by opposing the reimposition and application of the death penalty. Once abolished the death penalty is seldom reintroduced: Moreover if the three drugs were administered out of sequence there was a high risk that the prisoner would suffer extreme pain during a lethal injection even without the outward appearance of pain [27].

Ricky Rector was apparently aware of the problem and helped the execution team in their task. Interestingly also, no public official has been sentenced to death for crimesinvolving public officials. Real protection against criminality lies not with the death penalty but with reform of the police investigative agencies and the judiciary.

Public confidence has been shaken by open charges of corruption and failures to uphold strict impartiality-which have been levelled at judges up to the Supreme Court itself, specifically in relation to commercial cases. His request for a re-trial, to allow new witnesses to come forward, was refused in May There is mounting concern that lower court judges, to some extent affected by a political and popular climate calling for rapid sentencing, are not ensuring that death penalty cases adhere to the legal safeguards defined in Article 14 of the ICCPR.

Amending for that Purpose the Revised Penal Code. Constitutional challengeThis is extensively discussed in the instance of Peoples vs.